|
You are here: Home
> North Wind 14 > GEORGE
MACDONALD AND JEAN PAUL: AN INTRODUCTION
|
GEORGE MACDONALD AND JEAN
PAUL: AN INTRODUCTION
|
|
William Webb
Why was George MacDonald so strongly drawn to German literature
of the Romantic period? Did these poets and story-tellers show him
a different way of regarding the world, or was their work more like
confirmation of what he had already felt and thought for himself?
I recently discussed MacDonald in relation to the poet Novalis,
(1) here I want to consider the influence of another German, a novelist
of a kind unique in German and probably in any other language.
As with Novalis, MacDonald seems to have had a truly personal feeling
for Jean Paul Richter (1763-1825). He was originally Johann Paul
Friedrich Richter, but he preferred to use only his first two names,
with the first changed to Jean as a tribute to Rousseau whom he
greatly admired. Jean Paul cannot be labeled a religious writer,
but he is not a materialist either and has his own brand of mysticism.
Thomas Carlyle showed enormous enthusiasm for him and was probably
his greatest admirer in the English-speaking world. He insists upon
the German's firm belief in immortality.
Jean Paul is so little known in Britain and America today that
one is surprised how often one meets with his name when reading
books of the nineteenth century. Carlyle translated many of his
works. Other writers whom he influenced included De Quincey and
Meredith. In an unexpected testimonial we actually find Sherlock
Holmes discussing Jean Paul and suggesting that the German had been
the fountain-head of Carlyle's own work.
Jean Paul was the son of a clergyman in Bavaria, and he had to
struggle with poverty for most of his early life. He went to university
but was unable to complete his studies there. He turned to journalism
to get a bare living. Later he found aristocratic and even royal
patronage. He became especially popular with women readers-who were
in any case the main public for fiction in Germany and England.
He did not express his imaginations in the form of the Märchen or
'fairy tale,' and he cannot really be called a myth-maker. He was
acquainted with the leading English novelists of the eighteenth
century, and shows the influence of Lawrence Sterne. Like Sterne,
he is an eccentric who delights in catching the reader by surprise
with sudden changes of mood or strange digressions. He is fond of
learned footnotes, sometimes burlesquing more solemn authors. His
own imagery and allusions are quite often derived from extraordinary
items in encyclopedias of the time.
His more serious side is very different. He abandons irony when
describing heroic or tragic incidents-and when dealing with nature,
which can arouse a particular ecstasy in him. Like MacDonald, he
occasionally gives us scenes in Italy, although Jean Paul never
actually saw these himself.
His use of dreams in fiction is very original; in fact the 'Dream'
becomes a new literary form in his hands, which has been the subject
of special academic studies. Such dreams are usually not integrated
into the main story but are insertions or digressions. They are
sometimes mysterious and apocalyptic, and may express a tragic nihilism,
of a depth not found in French or English literature until almost
a century later. I shall mention a dream that particularly impressed
MacDonald further on.
Other interludes in Jean Paul's narratives are general comments
or intrusions by the author in his own person. Occasionally there
are comments by a character from an entirely different novel of
his.
Before turning to MacDonald's actual references to Jean Paul, it
is worth mentioning that English readers can get a fair idea of
him from the translations of Carlyle, along with his prefaces to
these. The American poet Longfellow visited Germany and produced
a book called Hyperion (1839) showing how he succumbed to
the magic of German Romantic literature. Hyperion is largely
based upon his own experiences and includes an appreciative chapter
on Jean Paul, the "Only One." Longfellow's story Kavanagh
has a strong flavour of Jean Paul about it. If MacDonald had
gone to Germany to study science, as at one time he thought of doing,
he might have produced a semi-autobiographical work something like
Hyperion himself.
MacDonald is fond of chapter mottoes or epigraphs in his first
books, and one from Jean Paul heads chapter 18 of Phantastes.
Iwill discuss this one a little later. In his first realistic
story, David Elginbrod, chapter 2 has an epigraph from Jean
Paul on the subject of education. If MacDonald had not named the
novel quoted-The Invisible Lodge-, I should have assumed
it was from Levana, a work on education influenced by the
ideas of Rousseau. However, the novel mentioned is indeed a Bildungsroman,
a study of the hero's development. MacDonald's stories Alec
Forbes and Robert Falconer-and to some extent Ranald
Bannerman's Boyhood- are in the Bildungsroman class,
and all show traces of reading Jean Paul.
In Alec Forbes, MacDonald seems to draw on Jean Paul
particularly in relation to the characters of women-'feminality,'
as he calls it in another book. Women may change their attitudes
to you overnight, he says (209), agreeing with an observation in
Jean Paul's Hesperus (vol. 3. 207). Some pages further on
we encounter the opinion of MacDonald's character Kate that everything
must be sacrificed to Love, and the young Alec is inclined to believe
her. MacDonald implies that she has been over-influenced by romantic
fiction. There is a similar situation, involving the character Linda,
in Jean Paul's Titan. MacDonald seems to feel that Jean Paul
is especially wise on the subject of women's psychology.
Jean Paul's appearance in Robert Falconer is more revealing,
and more relevant to MacDonald's own gifts as a novelist. The young
Robert escapes for a while from his cheerless home to stay at a
farm and enjoy the delights of freedom in the country (108~9). In
a passage of his best prose, MacDonald evokes country sights, sounds
and scents and yet modestly tells us that only Jean Paul could have
done justice to this theme of boyish ecstasy. I doubt if the latter
could have done it better in this case, though he is indeed a skillful
word-painter.
MacDonald's story Ranald Bannerman's Boyhood contains a
very personal account of the hero's guilt and fear when he has run
away from home after being treated cruelly by a teacher at the local
school. He eventually returns, longing for the comfort of his father's
presence, even though he expects to be punished for disobedience.
When, for some reason, his father cannot be found, the boy experiences
utter dispair and cries himself to sleep:
Years after...I read Jean Paul's terrible dream that
there was no God, and the desolation of this night was my key to
that dream (46).(2)
The incident might well be autobiography as it makes such an impression
of truth. The reference is to a 'Dream' which became much more famous
than the novel in which it occurs-Flower, Fruit and Thorn Pieces.
The dream has no obvious connection with the main story, but
has its own heading: "Speech of the dead Christ from the cross."
The author evokes a dark and grim atmosphere as the human dead look
up and ask if there is a God. From far above them Christ replies:
'There is no God' (256). (2) Carlyle was one of those who were greatly
moved by this bleak despairing vision.
No doubt MacDonald was an experienced dreamer (if one can put it
like that) before he knew of Jean Paul, but it is possible the German
gave him more confidence in using dreams in his fiction-though never
as separate, detachable elements. This dream denial of God may have
influenced in a general way MacDonald's Wilfrid Cumbermede,
written at about the same time as the story of Ranald. It has
a dark and pessimistic tone, with a love affair which ends in frustration
and bitter disappointment. The suicide of Wilfrid's best friend
is treated with more tolerance than one would have expected from
a profoundly Christian writer, and some of the dreams related are
unusually macabre.
In Jean Paul's novel Titan, MacDonald seems to have been
particularly struck by the character Schoppe, who is the satiric
chorus of the narrative. He had first appeared in the Flower
Pieces . . under a different name. Schoppe comes to a fancy-dress
ball at court, carrying in a glass case a sort of portable puppet
show in which the figures imitate the dancing humans and are also
reflected in a mirror at the back (vol. 1. 347). MacDonald uses
this scene as a comparison, in A Dish of Orts, when about
to review a book containing a collection of book reviews (T.T. Lynch
Essays on Some Forms of Literature). In this task he himself
feels involved in a similar situation of multiple reflections (218-19).
MacDonald associates the figure of Schoppe with thoughts of the
Self and man's true identity. 'No one has my form but the I [the
self or ego],' Schoppe says, and MacDonald uses this as one of the
epigraphs for chapter 22 of Phantastes. Jean Paul was influenced
by certain philosophers of his time in Germany, especially Fichte,
who treated the subject of human personality and identity. Themes
such as mirror images, Doppelgangers and duplicate selves
had a great appeal to writers of fantasy like Hoffmann and Tieck,
and we see them also in MacDonald's Phantastes, The Flight of
the Shadow and Lilith. It may be significant that MacDonald
brings the mirror into a different context in another epigraph in
Phantastes (chapter 18). He decides to put a prose thought
from Jean Paul into verse:
From dreams of bliss shall men awake
One day, but not to weep:
The dreams remain, they only break
The mirror of the sleep.
The word 'mirror' is not in the original at all.
Jean Paul himself may have been influenced by the short-lived poet
Novalis, who more than once expresses a very similar idea to the
lines quoted, for instance in words which MacDonald puts at the
head of the very last chapter of Phantastes: 'Our life is
no dream, but it ought to become one, and perhaps will.'
I have not succeeded in tracking down every quotation or reference
to Jean Paul in MacDonald to an exact source. Generally the German
demands slow reading, as his thought, vocabulary and general style
are all difficult at times-and his works are voluminous. One of
the untraced quotations is in the essay by MacDonald on Shakespeare's
tragic heroes in A Dish of Orts, where he agrees with Jean
Paul that we have a desire to follow them into a future life, to
have 'a piece of the next world painted in' (131).
MacDonald refers to the physical appearance of Jean Paul in his
novel Weighed and Wanting. When he says his character resembled
the portrait of Jean Paul 'in the Paris edition of his works' (93),
did he really expect his readers to have Jean Paul's works to hand
in the specified edition? It seems too much to expect. But the physical
appearance of certain writers seems to have been as important to
MacDonald as the portraits of Shakespeare and Milton were to John
Keats. Novalis and Jean Paul especially were personalities, not
merely printed pages.
Also in Weighed and Wanting, MacDonald makes a brief reference,
as a metaphor, to a staircase mentioned by Jean Paul which took
a person up when he thought he was going down. I have not found
a source for this, but the significance of stairs in stories by
MacDonald has often been noted.
The thought of stairs leading up towards air and heaven suggests
another topic which links MacDonald and the German author: the open
air as a release from various prisons or restricting conditions-some
kind of flight towards the Divine. MacDonald always writes well
on this theme of air and space, of wind and sky. One thinks of little
Diamond's experiences with North Wind, which are so wonderful as
well as alarming. Other characters delight in escaping into the
free air of the hills, as Sir Gibbie does after terrible events
in the city. Robert Falconer climbs the dizzy height of Antwerp
cathedral tower and finds it a spiritual revelation (as did MacDonald
himself on his travels). I should like to relate this heartfelt
writing to a passage from Titan:
Albano stationed himself on the outermost ridge of the
valley that opened out so beautifully below, and every gust of wind
blew into his heart that old childish longing to be able to fly.
Oh what bliss, to tear oneself away from the weight of earth that
drags us back and to rise up free, borne away into the distant aether-to
splash about as it were in the bath of air as it blows through you,
to fly into the dawn clouds and hover unseen near the lark that
sings beneath you-to fly in the eagle's wake, and look on cities
below with their patterns of steps, long rivers stretched like grey
ropes between different countries, meadows and hills sunk into little
patches of colour and shadows of varied hues - to sink at last onto
the top of some tower and face the burning evening sun-then to fly
up after it has set and watch it passing into the chasm of night,
while you still flutter intoxicated among the crimson clouds that
burn like a forest fire (vol. 1. 98).
Similarly MacDonald's Gibbie felt like 'the monarch of space,'
'his lungs filled with the heavenly air' (72). In Heather and
Snow, Steenie longs for the spaces of heaven but is always held
back by his 'terrible heavy feet' (36). When MacDonald's characters
climb roofs or escape through high windows, one notices, even in
passing, the same sensitivity to aerial space.
In Wilfrid Cumbermede, MacDonald (in the person of the narrator
Wilfrid) draws attention to a favourite motif in Jean Paul, that
of the character apparently of humble origin who is finally proved
to be the son of some distinguished or aristocratic person, perhaps
heir to an estate. This much-used theme belongs to folk tales in
the first place, but MacDonald assures us that although his hero
had this fancy about himself 'he had not yet read Titan, or
Hesperus or Comet (76), all books by Jean Paul. MacDonald's
Sir Gibbie, Malcolm, and Clare (the hero of A Rough Shaking)
are all 'lost heirs.'
I mentioned that Jean Paul knew the work of the English writer
Lawrence Sterne. Literary historians have never found anyone to
set beside Jean Paul, with the one exception of this famous clerical
novelist. Yet Sterne is the only author named by MacDonald for whom
he had an active dislike. From other references we can be sure that
he put his own feelings into the mouth of the eloquent if unrespectable
Mr. Cupples in Alec Forbes, where he maintains that Sterne's
Tristram Shandy is 'a pailace o' dirt and impidence and speeritual
stink' (173). Certainly Sterne is not a poet or visionary or true
nature-lover, yet the situation seems strange. Did MacDonald ever
sample Sterne's many published sermons-or would he have dismissed
them as mere hypocrisy? The subject seems worth further investigation.
Jean Paul will probably never regain the reputation among readers
of English that he had throughout the nineteenth century and up
to the first world war. The eulogies of Thomas Carlyle are too high-pitched
to convince readers today. But I have endeavoured to show the lasting
admiration that George MacDonald felt. He would certainly have agreed
with the opinion of that wise investigator Sherlock Holmes in chapter
7 of The Sign of Four: 'There is much food for thought in
Richter.'
NOTES
1. Novalis. Hymns to the Night; Spiritual Songs. Trs. George
MacDonald. With Afterword by William Webb. London: Temple Lodge,
1992.
2. The dream is quoted in Sneed, J.W. Jean Paul's Dreams. London:
Oxford U.P., 1966.
WORKS QUOTED
By George MacDonald
Alec Forbes of Howglen. London: Hurst & Blackett, [1867].
A Dish of Orts. London: Sampson Low Marston & Co, 1895.
Heather and Snow. London: Chatto & Windus, 1894.
Phantastes. Whitethorn: Johannesen, 1994.
Ranald BannermanÕs Boyhood. Whitethorn: Johannesen, 1993.
Robert Falconer. London: Hurst ~ Blackett, [1870].
Sir Gibbie. Whitethorn: Johannesen, 1991.
Weighed and Wanting. London Sampson Low,1883.
Wilfrid Cumbermede. London: Kegan Paul, 1893.
By Jean Paul
Flower, Fruit and Thorn Pieces. Reclam, undated.
Hesperus. 1841.
Titian. 1846.
© 2005 All Rights Reserved.
Copyright is owned jointly by the MacDonald Society and Contributors.
|